Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the compact sedan segment

2017 Kia Forte vs 2017 Mazda Mazda3

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-07-21 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2017 Mazda Mazda3 edges ahead by a narrow margin

These two are direct rivals built for the same use case. The 2017 Mazda Mazda3 comes out slightly ahead on reliability data (3.9 versus 3.6), but the margin is small enough that specific feature preferences could legitimately tip the choice the other way.

2017 Kia Forte

3.6/5
Reliability score
300 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$11,800 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2017 Mazda Mazda3

3.9/5
Reliability score
83 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,150 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

The 2017 Mazda Mazda3 edges this one, but it's tight. We're talking 3.9 versus 3.6 on reliability. Close enough that specific feature preferences or one favorable price could legitimately swing it the other way.

If you lean 2017 Kia Forte, know what you're getting into on engine and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Mazda Mazda3 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2017 Mazda Mazda3? Watch the brakes and visibility. The 2017 Kia Forte has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2017 Kia Forte. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2017 Kia Forte
2017 Mazda Mazda3
engine
110 reports
severe · ~$3,100
3 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
43 reports
severe · ~$850
19 reports
moderate · ~$850
lighting
29 reports
severe · ~$250
No reports
airbags
16 reports
critical · ~$1,100
No reports
powertrain
11 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
3 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
cruise control
12 reports
moderate · ~$600
No reports
body
6 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
4 reports
severe · ~$1,500
steering
9 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
brakes
No reports
5 reports
severe · ~$450
visibility
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$350

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2017 Kia Forte or the 2017 Mazda Mazda3?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Mazda Mazda3 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.9 versus 3.6. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Kia Forte?

Compared to the 2017 Mazda Mazda3, the 2017 Kia Forte sees more reported issues in engine and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Mazda Mazda3?

Compared to the 2017 Kia Forte, the 2017 Mazda Mazda3 has more complaints in brakes and visibility. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 0 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $11,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2017 Kia Forte on NHTSA · 2017 Mazda Mazda3 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Sponsored
Get a free warranty quote →