Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2014 Toyota Highlander body problems

moderate Owners of the 2014 Toyota Highlander have filed 27 NHTSA complaints about the body, typically surfacing around 49,000 miles at roughly $1,500 to repair (U.S. federal records, as of July 2026). Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. See body across all vehicles →

Failure mileage
Complaints
27
Recalls
0
Avg fix
$1,500
body complaints on the Toyota Highlander, by model year
Model yearbody complaints
2010 Highlander 8
2011 Highlander 25
2012 Highlander 21
2013 Highlander 13
2014 Highlander (this page) 27
2015 Highlander 19
2016 Highlander 4
2017 Highlander 6
2018 Highlander 8

When does it fail?

Of the 27 body complaints filed for the 2014 Toyota Highlander, here's the actual mileage breakdown — failures cluster heaviest at 0-25,000 mi.

0-25k
1 (33.3%)
25-50k
1 (33.3%)
50-75k
1 (33.3%)
75-100k
0 (0%)
100-125k
0 (0%)
125-150k
0 (0%)
150k+
0 (0%)

Each bar shows the share of total complaints filed at that mileage range. Peak failure window highlighted. Some owners report problems earlier; some make it well past 150,000 miles symptom-free. Maintenance habits and driving conditions shift the curve as much as mileage alone.

What stands out

Owners have filed 27 body complaints with NHTSA against this vehicle, but no formal recall covers the issue — the federal record reflects what manufacturers have admitted, not everything owners are reporting.

Body accounts for 20% of all owner complaints filed against this vehicle, across 10 categories tracked.

Is there a fix? Manufacturer service bulletins

The manufacturer has issued service bulletins covering body on this vehicle — documented repair instructions, service campaigns, or warranty extensions sent to dealers. A TSB isn't a recall (it's not a free safety remedy), but it's the manufacturer acknowledging the issue and how to fix it.

Service Bulletin T-SB-0035-24 Rev2 Dec 2024

Acid rain results from rainwater or other airborne moisture that become acidic due to industrial chemical impurities in the atmosphere. If these acidic compounds settle on an exposed vehicle, especially the horizontal areas such as the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage to the painted surfaces can occur. Acid rain damage can typically be identified on vehicles by the presence of stains on the paint surface that resemble hard water spots. Unlike water spots however, acid rain damage cannot be removed by regular washing procedures. Also, because acid rain can etch and soften the paint, normal buffing or polishing repair procedures should not be attempted. This can cause further damage

full bulletin at NHTSA ↗
Service Bulletin T-SB-0038-24 Rev2 Dec 2024

To prevent brake rotor rust from forming during transportation and storage, wheel film will be used instead of a cardboard type of anti-rust cover. The purpose of the wheel film is to shield the disc brake rotor from weather elements and initial rust before the vehicle is delivered to the customer. Consequently, the film should remain on the wheel for as long as possible.

full bulletin at NHTSA ↗
Service Bulletin T-SB-0039-24 Rev2 Dec 2024

The condition known as acid rain is caused by airborne chemicals or particles in the atmosphere, which mix with rainwater, nighttime dew, or high humidity to form acidic compounds. If these contaminants settle and remain on a painted vehicle surface, especially the horizonal areas of the hood, roof, and decklid, significant damage can occur. This damage is the result of actual etching of the paint and appears as pitting or water spots. As acid rain droplets on the vehicle surface evaporate, the concentration strength of the acid increases, causing deeper and more rapid damage. This evaporation and corrosive action also occur more rapidly on dark colored cars as direct sun heat increases. It

full bulletin at NHTSA ↗
Service Bulletin T-SB-0061-23 Rev2 Dec 2024

Toyota vehicles are currently protected with RapgardTM protective film designed to protect the horizontal painted surfaces. This material protects from acid rain, environmental fallout, and rail contamination. Follow the Removal Procedure in this bulletin to remove the RapgardTM protective film within 90 days from initial application.

full bulletin at NHTSA ↗
Service Bulletin T-SB-0062-23 Rev2 Dec 2024

Vehicles may occasionally be subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles shed from railroad tracks, train wheels, exposure to heavy machinery facilities, grinding, welding, etc. This type of contamination can be identified by the presence of small, red or brown particles on the paint surface. These particles are often difficult to see on dark color paints but can be easily felt when brushing a hand across horizontal body surfaces such as the hood, roof, or deck lid. Follow the Repair Procedure in this bulletin to clean vehicles that may have been subjected to contamination by airborne iron particles such as rail dust during rail transportation or extended storage near industrial ar

full bulletin at NHTSA ↗

Source: NHTSA manufacturer communications. Bring the bulletin number to your dealer or shop.

The failure pattern owners describe

Water intrusion is the most serious complaint. Multiple owners describe water entering through the sunroof drain system, A-frame panels, and roof rail bolts, accumulating underneath carpets and in vehicle cavities. One owner documented black mold spreading throughout the interior, carpets, foam, and frame within a year of purchase. Toyota's internal document T-TT-0322-15 confirms this is a manufacturing defect caused by a kinked sunroof drain, yet the company declined to recall it, arguing mold exposure is not a "safety issue."

The power rear liftgate is chronically problematic. Owners report it opens or closes partway then stops, beeps and won't operate, fails entirely in cold temperatures, or requires manual override against strong motor resistance. Some who've had the entire assembly replaced report the problem returns within days. Service Bulletin T-SB-0023-16 addresses the issue for some model years, but Toyota's coverage is inconsistent—some 2014 models covered under warranty, others denied despite identical defects.

Door lock actuators fail intermittently, leaving owners unable to lock or unlock specific doors. Driver-side sun visors fail to retract, obstructing vision. Blizzard Pearl paint peels prematurely and chrome grille coatings bubble and peel, even on well-maintained, garage-kept vehicles. One owner reported sunroof glass ejecting from the frame at highway speed. Multiple owners cite excessive wind noise entering through improperly fitted window frames and door seals.

Same Toyota Highlander body reports on nearby years: 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2015

Failure modes owners describe

Water intrusion and black mold from kinked sunroof drain

Water enters through the A-frame seat belt panel and sunroof drain system, accumulating inside the vehicle and underneath carpets. Extensive black mold develops throughout the interior, carpets, sound barrier foam, and frame. Toyota internal document T-TT-0322-15 identifies a kinked sunroof drain during manufacturing as the root cause.

When: Begins within first year of ownership (reported 2/2015 on 2/2014 purchase); also reported in other narratives as recurring during rainy seasons

Symptoms owners cite: Standing water inside vehicle; Water intrusion through A-frame panel; Water leaking through roof rail bolts and running down pillars to floor; Extensive black mold growth; Wet carpets for extended periods during rain

Codes mentioned: T-TT-0322-15

Repairs/costs cited: Toyota's remediation process described as inadequate by owner; no documentation of thorough environmental risk evaluation or mold remediation certification provided

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Internal technical document T-TT-0322-15 acknowledges manufacturing defect; Toyota corporate declined to issue recall, stating it was not a safety issue like brake failure

Power rear liftgate failure—intermittent operation and complete shutdown

The electric power liftgate operates sporadically or not at all. It opens partway then stops, requires manual override against motor resistance, fails to close fully, or remains inoperative. Problem is temperature-dependent, worsening in cold weather and rain. Multiple owners report ongoing issues since 2014 despite dealer visits and repair attempts including full assembly replacement.

When: Begins within first few years; worsens in cold temperatures (reported in winter months in multiple narratives); one case noted failure at 30,000 miles

Symptoms owners cite: Door opens partway and stops; Door closes partway and stops; Manual override required against motor resistance; Failure in rain conditions; Complete inoperability in cold temperatures; Beeping with no operation; Failure to lock automatically; Door stalls during opening and closing; Door extremely difficult to open or close manually

Codes mentioned: T-SB-0023-16

Repairs/costs cited: Dealer solutions include replacing liftgate support struts, entire liftgate assembly, and rear lift gate cylinders (reported cost $1,550 for cylinder replacement); repairs frequently fail to resolve issue permanently

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Service Bulletin T-SB-0023-16 issued for 2014/2015 Highlanders; coverage varies by year and warranty status—some vehicles covered under warranty, others denied coverage as out-of-warranty despite identical defect; Toyota claims no recall applicable

Door lock actuator failure—intermittent locking/unlocking

Front and rear door locks fail to engage or disengage properly. Doors unlock inconsistently, stick when attempting to lock, or fail to unlock. Problem occurs intermittently over extended period, creating security and safety concerns while driving and parked.

When: Ongoing issues spanning 3-4 years in some cases; failures reported across various mileages

Symptoms owners cite: Doors fail to unlock when lock button pressed; Doors fail to lock when lock button pressed; Doors stick and do not disengage; Intermittent locking/unlocking

Repairs/costs cited: Door lock actuator replacement required (driver-side rear door replacement noted)

Door seal and frame fitment issues causing excessive wind noise

Significant wind noise breaches the door seal and enters the cabin during highway driving, especially noticeable at the driver's side window near the mirror. Problem is intermittent and depends on how door is closed and wind conditions. Owner reports window frame black plastic panel was improperly seated; replacement attempted though effectiveness not yet confirmed.

When: Reported during highway driving at 70+ mph; intermittent occurrence

Symptoms owners cite: Excessive wind noise entering cabin; Noise breaches door seal; Intermittent noise even at high speeds; Issue most noticeable at driver's side window by mirror

Repairs/costs cited: Window frame black plastic panel replacement performed; new door seal ordered but not installed due to owner assessment that seal was not faulty

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Multiple owners report this issue online; dealer tech manager confirmed problem upon test drive

Driver-side sun visor failure to retract

Sun visor fails to retract and obstructs driver visibility, creating a safety hazard. Failure occurred at 59,000 miles.

When: 59,000 miles

Symptoms owners cite: Visor fails to retract; Obscured driver visibility at stop sign

Repairs/costs cited: Driver's side sun visor replacement required

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No recall applicable per manufacturer

Blizzard Pearl paint peeling and corrosion

Paint in Blizzard Pearl color peels off the top of vehicle, patch grows larger over time, exposing body to elements and risking rust formation. Vehicle was garage-kept and did not suffer immediate paint failure. Toyota acknowledged the problem but provided only a narrow window for customer notification and repair coverage, failing to account for different failure timelines based on climate and vehicle storage.

When: Peeling occurs at varying times depending on climate and storage; vehicle was garage-kept

Symptoms owners cite: Paint peels off top of vehicle; Peeled area grows larger; Body exposure to elements

Repairs/costs cited: Out-of-pocket repair required; warranty coverage period has closed

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Toyota acknowledged problem but did not ensure adequate customer notification; provided narrow repair coverage window

Chrome grille bubbling and peeling

Chrome grille coating bubbles and begins to peel despite vehicle being garage-kept and well-maintained since purchase. Defect reduces vehicle value.

When: Noticed recently on garage-kept vehicle

Symptoms owners cite: Chrome bubbling; Chrome peeling

Sunroof glass ejection

Sunroof glass suddenly came out of frame and was ejected from vehicle while driving at 70 mph on highway. Toyota inspected vehicle but refused warranty coverage citing out-of-warranty status, despite acknowledging the defect.

When: Out-of-warranty at time of failure

Symptoms owners cite: Sunroof glass ejected from frame; Air implosion sound; Air flow from sunroof area

Repairs/costs cited: Not covered under warranty; owner responsibility for repair

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Toyota inspection confirmed defect but denied warranty coverage as out-of-warranty

Heavy hood requiring excessive force to prop open

Front hood is extremely heavy and difficult to prop open, creating inconvenience during routine maintenance. Dealer characterized as normal occurrence.

When: Noted at service; vehicle had not experienced failure

Symptoms owners cite: Hood extremely heavy and difficult to prop open

Repairs/costs cited: No repair performed; dealer stated normal

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Manufacturer made aware; vehicle could not be repaired

Liftgate support strut failure

Liftgate support struts fail, preventing hatchback from opening fully. Dealer identified struts as needing replacement at approximately 43,000 miles.

When: 43,000 miles

Symptoms owners cite: Hatchback fails to open fully

Repairs/costs cited: Support struts need replacement

Liftgate squealing and sticking

Rear liftgate squeals loudly when left open for a few minutes and feels sticky. Works normally when opened and closed quickly. Owner concerned the faulty behavior indicates premature failure.

When: Observed during normal use

Symptoms owners cite: Terribly loud squealing when left open; Sticky sensation; Squealing indicates potential failure

Synthesized from 27 NHTSA owner complaints — unverified consumer allegations, summarized for patterns. The verbatim filings appear below.

What owners are reporting 4 most recent

body · 50,200 mi · filed 12/20/2017

Power lift gate will not open or close and lock when the outdoor temperature is below 32 degrees f. Vehicle is stationary and cold as stated.

body · filed 12/12/2017

Chrome grill is bubbling and looks like it's getting ready to peel. My car has always been garaged and taken care of since I bought it brand new.. This is a defect that will definitely lower the value of my car. My husband noticed this issue just recently when I was pulling into the garage.

body · 5,000 mi · filed 12/08/2014

Automatic liftgate does not close. Starts to close, stops, then beeps. Requires manual closure. Have had in for repair 5 times, including having the entire assembly replaced. Still malfunctions. While using a loaner car of the same make/model/year, it had the same malfunction. *tr

body · 30,000 mi · filed 11/21/2017

Tl* the contact owns a 2014 Toyota highlander. The contact stated that the liftgate system failed. The contact was unable to unlock or close the liftgate automatically. The contact had to open the liftgate manually and hold the liftgate open manually. The vehicle was not taken to a dealer for diagnostic testing. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The liftgate was not repaired. The…

Had body trouble with your 2014 Toyota Highlander? File a complaint with NHTSA → It's free, official, and how every report above got here — owner filings are the federal safety record this page is built on.

Common questions

How serious is the body problem on the 2014 Toyota Highlander?

It's a documented issue but not catastrophic. 27 complaints have been filed. Repairs average $1,500 and most owners catch it before it causes a breakdown.

At what mileage does the body typically fail?

Across the 15 complaints that reported odometer mileage, most body failures cluster between 15,586 and 59,000 miles, with the median around 49,000. A quarter of owners report trouble before 15,586; a quarter make it past 59,000. Maintenance history matters more than the odometer alone — this is the reported failure window, not a guarantee.

What does it cost to fix?

Independent shops typically charge around $1,500 for body repairs on this vehicle. Dealer pricing tends to run 20-40% higher. The exact figure depends on the specific failure mode, parts availability, and your local labor rates. If you're outside factory warranty, an extended service contract often covers this category.

Are there any recalls related to body?

No active recalls currently cover body issues on this vehicle. The complaints filed represent owner-reported failures that haven't risen to the level of a manufacturer-issued recall — but they're still worth knowing about before you buy or budget for repairs.

Related

Complaint and recall data sourced from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) public records database. Verify the raw federal record at nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2014/Toyota/Highlander. Severity ratings are derived from reported crashes, fires, injuries, and fatalities. Repair cost estimates are independent-shop national averages and may differ in your area. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Sponsored
Get a free warranty quote →