INTELLIGENT CRUISE CONTROL INOPERATIVE AND AEB/FEB WARNING LIGHT ON OR RADAR OBSTRUCTION MESSAGE DISPLAYED WITH DTC C1A16 OR C2582 IF YOU CONFIRM IMPORTANT: The purpose of ACTION (on the next page) is to give you a quick idea of the work you will be performing. You MUST closely follow the entire SERVICE PROCEDURE as it contains information that is essential to successfully completing this repair. Nissan Bulletins are intended for use by qualified technicians, not 'do-it-yourselfers'. Qualified technicians are properly trained individuals who have the equipment, tools, safety instruction, and know-how to do a job properly and safely. NOTE: If you believe that a described condition may apply t
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗2022 Nissan Pathfinder brakes problems
moderate Owners of the 2022 Nissan Pathfinder have filed 23 NHTSA complaints about the brakes at roughly $450 to repair (U.S. federal records, as of July 2026). Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. See brakes across all vehicles →
Complaints
23
Recalls
0
Avg fix
$450
| Model year | brakes complaints |
|---|---|
| 2018 Pathfinder | 7 |
| 2019 Pathfinder | 7 |
| 2020 Pathfinder | 7 |
| 2022 Pathfinder (this page) | 23 |
| 2023 Pathfinder | 16 |
| 2024 Pathfinder | 16 |
What stands out
Among the 16 model years of Nissan Pathfinder in our records for brakes problems, this one ranks #2 by owner-complaint volume.
Is there a fix? Manufacturer service bulletins
The manufacturer has issued service bulletins covering brakes on this vehicle — documented repair instructions, service campaigns, or warranty extensions sent to dealers. A TSB isn't a recall (it's not a free safety remedy), but it's the manufacturer acknowledging the issue and how to fix it.
AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING WARNING LIGHT BLINKING APPLIED SYSTEMS: Vehicles equipped with a lane camera (see Figure 1) SERVICE INFORMATION If the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) warning light or is blinking (but not illuminated steadily) or the customer states it is blinking, and there are no related DTCs, inspect the windshield. A blinking AEB warning light may occur under the following conditions: When contamination or foreign material adhere to the lane camera viewing window on the windshield. When driving while it is snowing or when frost forms on the lane camera viewing window on the windshield. When the lane camera viewing window on the windshield is temporarily fogged up. Fig
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗COMBINATION METER MODULES OR ABS CONTROL UNITS CANNOT BE SWAPPED This bulletin has been amended. See AMENDMENT HISTORY, below. Please discard previous versions of this bulletin.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗Source: NHTSA manufacturer communications. Bring the bulletin number to your dealer or shop.
The failure pattern owners describe
A clear pattern emerges across these 22 complaints: rear brake pads on the 2022 Pathfinder are wearing out far faster than they should. Multiple owners report rear pads down to 2–4mm at 11,000–15,400 miles, while front pads show minimal wear. One owner replaced rear brakes twice by 27,500 miles; another did so four times by 44,000 miles. A dealership technician confirmed the root cause (complaint #3): the rear brakes make constant contact with the front brakes during normal braking, causing abnormal wear. That same dealer agreed it was a manufacturer design defect and refunded the repair cost.
Owners also report associated failures: rotors becoming corroded or warped, brake pedals pulsating or fading, and in one case, stopping distances extending to 50–100 feet at highway speeds. One owner's collision-avoidance system engaged without warning. Nissan has denied most warranty claims, classifying brake failure as wear-and-tear, and has issued no recall. Brake parts are frequently on national backorder. Owners point to their 2015 Pathfinders, which lasted 40,000+ miles on a single brake set, as evidence this is not normal wear.
Same Nissan Pathfinder brakes reports on nearby years: 2023 · 2024
Failure modes owners describe
Rear brake pad premature wear
Rear brake pads wearing out at 8–14k miles (in some cases 3–4 times by 44k miles total), while front pads remain largely unaffected. Owners report pads dropping from factory thickness (7–8mm) to 2–4mm in just 3,400–5,000 miles. One owner noted rear pads worn in less than 6k miles of use; another documented two replacements by 27,500 miles. Dealership technicians confirm pattern but classify as wear-and-tear.
When: First occurrence: 11,000–15,400 miles; recurrent by 27,500–44,000 miles on affected vehicles
Symptoms owners cite: Grinding noise when braking (no dashboard warning); Brake pedal fade or delayed response; Extended stopping distance; High-pitched squeaking in reverse
Repairs/costs cited: Rear brake pad and/or rotor replacement; one owner cited $1,100 cost for caliper and pad repairs. Nissan parts frequently on 2–3 week national backorder.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Multiple owners report Nissan declined warranty claims, citing wear-and-tear exclusion. One owner (complaint #3) received refund after dealer confirmed design defect. No recall issued.
Rear brake system design defect
Dealer diagnostic (complaint #3) identified rear brakes making constant contact with front brakes when front brakes applied, causing abnormally rapid rear brake wear. Dealer agreed this was a manufacturer design defect. Complaint #11 owner suspects rear brake undersizing relative to 2015 model.
When: Identified at 30,517 miles but likely present from manufacture
Symptoms owners cite: Asymmetric wear pattern (rear much faster than front); Rear brake pads worn to metal while front remain serviceable
Repairs/costs cited: Rear brake replacement (pads, possible rotors, possible calipers). Repair fee refunded in at least one case after defect confirmation.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Dealership (complaint #3) acknowledged design defect; Nissan refunded repair cost in that instance. No broad recall or TSB issued.
Brake rotor wear and warping
Rotors becoming extremely worn or warping, often in conjunction with accelerated pad wear. Complaint #2 reported rotors described as 'extremely worn' and corroded at 4,400 miles. Complaint #10 sustained extreme rotor damage requiring replacement. Complaint #12 noted violent vibration during heavy braking; complaint #15 described pulsating pedal and humming. Complaint #22 mentions warping rotors.
When: 4,400–30,000 miles; often within first year of ownership
Symptoms owners cite: Pulsating or shuddering brake pedal; Violent vibration during braking; Humming noise when brake applied; Rotor corrosion visible to dealer
Repairs/costs cited: Rotor and pad replacement. Complaint #2 parts were on national backorder; repair not completed.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Complaint #2: Manufacturer filed case but declined assistance; parts not repaired. No recall or warranty extension offered for rotor failure.
Front brake rotor pulsation and fade
Complaint #15 reported premature front brake rotor failure causing pulsating brake pedal and humming when brake applied. Brake pedal feels as though it fades when first applied.
When: Timing not specified; classified as wear-and-tear by manufacturer
Symptoms owners cite: Pulsating brake pedal; Humming noise when braking; Brake pedal fade on initial application
Repairs/costs cited: Manufacturer classified rotor failure as wear-and-tear; warranty claim denied.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Denied coverage under manufacturer warranty, classifying as wear-and-tear item despite owner assertion of defect.
Front brake caliper overheating
Complaint #16: During routine highway travel with cruise control, both front calipers became hot and began smoking with no hard braking. Owner uncertain whether issue originates in calipers themselves, master cylinder, or other brake system component.
When: During routine highway driving; mileage not stated
Symptoms owners cite: Front calipers becoming excessively hot; Smoke from front brake area; Issue occurring without hard braking demand
Repairs/costs cited: Not specified; vehicle not reported as repaired
Brake system unresponsiveness and extended stopping distance
Complaint #2: At 4,400 miles, brakes failed to respond as needed, causing 50–100 ft. stopping distance delays. Vehicle nearly collided at 55–60 mph when pedal was depressed; driver had to apply tremendous pressure to stop. Driver-assist mode engaged. Dealer initially attributed to rotor corrosion but could not duplicate failure; eventual diagnosis was extremely worn rotors and pads requiring replacement. Complaint #5 reported extended braking distance with rear pads worn 8mm to 3mm in 3,400 miles.
When: 4,400 miles (complaint #2); 11,000 miles (complaint #5)
Symptoms owners cite: Delayed vehicle response to brake pedal; Extended stopping distance (50–100 ft.); Pedal requires excessive pressure; Near-collision incidents; Driver-assist system activation
Repairs/costs cited: Brake pad and rotor replacement; parts on national backorder in complaint #2, vehicle not repaired.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Complaint #2: Manufacturer notified and case filed; later declined to provide assistance. No help offered.
Synthesized from 23 NHTSA owner complaints — unverified consumer allegations, summarized for patterns. The verbatim filings appear below.
What owners are reporting 2 most recent
Collision avoidance system engaged without warning forcibly stopping vehicle in the middle of highway traffic with no obstructions in front of vehicle. Rear Brake pads also wearing out at less than 30k miles. Pads went from 7mm to 2mm thickness between 5k mile oil change intervals. This lead to extreme rotor damage and replacement of rotors and pads.
Upon routine service at 15,393 miles I was told that my rear brakes and rotors needed replacement. The service advisor stated that they are at a 2 and failed the multi-point inspection. I brought the vehicle to an independent shop and they confirmed the rear brakes needed immediate replacement. Upon further research, this seems to be a pattern for the 2022 Pathfinder with many people needing to…
Had brakes trouble with your 2022 Nissan Pathfinder?
File a complaint with NHTSA → It's free, official, and how every report above got here — owner filings are the federal safety record this page is built on.
Common questions
How serious is the brakes problem on the 2022 Nissan Pathfinder?
It's a documented issue but not catastrophic. 23 complaints have been filed. Repairs average $450 and most owners catch it before it causes a breakdown.
At what mileage does the brakes typically fail?
Based on the 23 complaints filed, brakes issues most often appear around 14,479 miles. Some report problems earlier; some make it well past 150,000 with no symptoms. Maintenance habits matter — vehicles that received timely fluid services and were not regularly overworked tend to last longer.
What does it cost to fix?
Independent shops typically charge around $450 for brakes repairs on this vehicle. Dealer pricing tends to run 20-40% higher. The exact figure depends on the specific failure mode, parts availability, and your local labor rates. If you're outside factory warranty, an extended service contract often covers this category.
Are there any recalls related to brakes?
No active recalls currently cover brakes issues on this vehicle. The complaints filed represent owner-reported failures that haven't risen to the level of a manufacturer-issued recall — but they're still worth knowing about before you buy or budget for repairs.
Related
Complaint and recall data sourced from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
public records database. Verify the raw federal record at
nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2022/Nissan/Pathfinder.
Severity ratings are derived from reported crashes, fires, injuries, and fatalities. Repair cost estimates are
independent-shop national averages and may differ in your area. Some links on this page are affiliate links.