Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2011 Chevrolet Malibu vs 2011 Mazda Mazda6

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2011 Chevrolet Malibu versus 2011 Mazda Mazda6 — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.1 versus 3.8) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2011 Chevrolet Malibu

3.1/5
Reliability score
973 complaints
1 recalls (1 critical)
$14,150 repair exposure
vs

2011 Mazda Mazda6

3.8/5
Reliability score
133 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$6,850 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2011 Chevrolet Malibu scores 3.1; the 2011 Mazda Mazda6 scores 3.8. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, know what you're getting into on steering and electrical. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2011 Mazda Mazda6 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2011 Mazda Mazda6? Watch the suspension and body. The 2011 Chevrolet Malibu has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 2.1x higher on the 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2011 Chevrolet Malibu
2011 Mazda Mazda6
steering
210 reports
severe · ~$700
15 reports
severe · ~$700
electrical
187 reports
severe · ~$850
7 reports
moderate · ~$850
powertrain
102 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
No reports
lighting
91 reports
moderate · ~$250
7 reports
moderate · ~$250
airbags
67 reports
severe · ~$1,100
28 reports
severe · ~$1,100
engine
62 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
cruise control
52 reports
severe · ~$600
No reports
suspension
No reports
38 reports
severe · ~$900
seatbelts
31 reports
severe · ~$500
No reports
body
No reports
10 reports
moderate · ~$1,500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2011 Chevrolet Malibu or the 2011 Mazda Mazda6?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2011 Mazda Mazda6 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.1. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2011 Chevrolet Malibu?

Compared to the 2011 Mazda Mazda6, the 2011 Chevrolet Malibu sees more reported issues in steering and electrical. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2011 Mazda Mazda6?

Compared to the 2011 Chevrolet Malibu, the 2011 Mazda Mazda6 has more complaints in suspension and body. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2011 Chevrolet Malibu has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,150 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2011 Chevrolet Malibu on NHTSA · 2011 Mazda Mazda6 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.