Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee versus 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.1 versus 4.0) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee

3.1/5
Reliability score
1,634 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$14,050 repair exposure
vs

2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser

4.0/5
Reliability score
39 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$3,600 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee scores 3.1; the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser scores 4.0. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee, know what you're getting into on electrical and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser? Watch the body and seatbelts. The 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 3.9x higher on the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser
electrical
774 reports
severe · ~$850
No reports
brakes
209 reports
severe · ~$450
No reports
engine
118 reports
severe · ~$3,100
No reports
steering
98 reports
severe · ~$700
9 reports
moderate · ~$700
powertrain
82 reports
severe · ~$2,500
No reports
airbags
38 reports
severe · ~$1,100
No reports
suspension
29 reports
severe · ~$900
3 reports
moderate · ~$900
fuel system
31 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
No reports
body
No reports
7 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
seatbelts
No reports
5 reports
moderate · ~$500

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee or the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser comes out ahead with a reliability score of 4.0 versus 3.1. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee?

Compared to the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser, the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee sees more reported issues in electrical and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser?

Compared to the 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee, the 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser has more complaints in body and seatbelts. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 1 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,050 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee on NHTSA · 2012 Toyota FJ Cruiser on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.