Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2013 Ford F-150 vs 2013 Toyota Tacoma

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 Ford F-150 versus 2013 Toyota Tacoma — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (2.9 versus 3.6) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2013 Ford F-150

2.9/5
Reliability score
2,796 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$14,550 repair exposure
vs

2013 Toyota Tacoma

3.6/5
Reliability score
124 complaints
2 recalls (0 critical)
$11,700 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2013 Ford F-150 scores 2.9; the 2013 Toyota Tacoma scores 3.6. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2013 Ford F-150, know what you're getting into on powertrain and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2013 Toyota Tacoma sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 Toyota Tacoma? Watch the suspension and airbags. The 2013 Ford F-150 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2013 Ford F-150. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 Ford F-150
2013 Toyota Tacoma
powertrain
1188 reports
critical · ~$2,500
19 reports
severe · ~$2,500
brakes
310 reports
severe · ~$450
9 reports
severe · ~$450
engine
254 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
No reports
electrical
229 reports
severe · ~$850
12 reports
severe · ~$850
steering
211 reports
severe · ~$700
13 reports
moderate · ~$700
visibility
149 reports
moderate · ~$350
No reports
cruise control
116 reports
moderate · ~$600
5 reports
severe · ~$600
body
33 reports
severe · ~$1,500
8 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
suspension
No reports
14 reports
severe · ~$900
airbags
No reports
7 reports
severe · ~$1,100

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 Ford F-150 or the 2013 Toyota Tacoma?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2013 Toyota Tacoma comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.6 versus 2.9. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Ford F-150?

Compared to the 2013 Toyota Tacoma, the 2013 Ford F-150 sees more reported issues in powertrain and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Toyota Tacoma?

Compared to the 2013 Ford F-150, the 2013 Toyota Tacoma has more complaints in suspension and airbags. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

Both vehicles have 2 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,550 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2013 Ford F-150 on NHTSA · 2013 Toyota Tacoma on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.