Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2013 Nissan Rogue vs 2013 Subaru Forester

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2013 Nissan Rogue versus 2013 Subaru Forester — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.5 versus 3.7) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2013 Nissan Rogue

3.5/5
Reliability score
605 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$14,000 repair exposure
vs

2013 Subaru Forester

3.7/5
Reliability score
77 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$8,350 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2013 Nissan Rogue scores 3.5; the 2013 Subaru Forester scores 3.7. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2013 Nissan Rogue, know what you're getting into on powertrain and airbags. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2013 Subaru Forester sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2013 Subaru Forester? Watch the brakes and lighting. The 2013 Nissan Rogue has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.7x higher on the 2013 Nissan Rogue. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2013 Nissan Rogue
2013 Subaru Forester
powertrain
311 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
6 reports
severe · ~$2,500
airbags
76 reports
critical · ~$1,100
12 reports
severe · ~$1,100
engine
35 reports
severe · ~$3,100
22 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
cruise control
44 reports
moderate · ~$600
7 reports
severe · ~$600
electrical
42 reports
severe · ~$850
No reports
body
14 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
No reports
steering
12 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
visibility
7 reports
moderate · ~$350
5 reports
moderate · ~$350
brakes
No reports
7 reports
moderate · ~$450
lighting
No reports
4 reports
moderate · ~$250

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2013 Nissan Rogue or the 2013 Subaru Forester?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2013 Subaru Forester comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 3.5. The margin is narrow, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Nissan Rogue?

Compared to the 2013 Subaru Forester, the 2013 Nissan Rogue sees more reported issues in powertrain and airbags. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2013 Subaru Forester?

Compared to the 2013 Nissan Rogue, the 2013 Subaru Forester has more complaints in brakes and lighting. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2013 Subaru Forester has more active recalls (3 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,000 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2013 Nissan Rogue on NHTSA · 2013 Subaru Forester on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.