Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the heavy duty truck segment

2015 Ford F-350 vs 2015 RAM 3500

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-08-02 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2015 Ford F-350 clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2015 Ford F-350 edges the 2015 RAM 3500 on reliability scoring (3.6 versus 2.2) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

More reliable

2015 Ford F-350

3.6/5
Reliability score
207 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$11,350 repair exposure
vs

2015 RAM 3500

2.2/5
Reliability score
136 complaints
16 recalls (0 critical)
$9,300 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2015 Ford F-350. Reliability score's a solid 3.6 versus 2.2 on the 2015 RAM 3500, and the complaint counts back it up — 207 versus 136. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2015 Ford F-350, know what you're getting into on steering and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2015 RAM 3500 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2015 RAM 3500? Watch the powertrain and brakes. The 2015 Ford F-350 has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2015 Ford F-350. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2015 Ford F-350
2015 RAM 3500
steering
67 reports
moderate · ~$700
21 reports
moderate · ~$700
powertrain
16 reports
severe · ~$2,500
30 reports
severe · ~$2,500
engine
25 reports
severe · ~$3,100
12 reports
severe · ~$3,100
suspension
26 reports
moderate · ~$900
10 reports
moderate · ~$900
electrical
14 reports
severe · ~$850
16 reports
severe · ~$850
brakes
4 reports
moderate · ~$450
12 reports
severe · ~$450
wheels
No reports
10 reports
moderate · ~$400
tires
5 reports
moderate · ~$150
No reports
fuel system
4 reports
moderate · ~$1,200
No reports
lighting
No reports
3 reports
moderate · ~$250

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2015 Ford F-350 or the 2015 RAM 3500?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2015 Ford F-350 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.6 versus 2.2. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2015 Ford F-350?

Compared to the 2015 RAM 3500, the 2015 Ford F-350 sees more reported issues in steering and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2015 RAM 3500?

Compared to the 2015 Ford F-350, the 2015 RAM 3500 has more complaints in powertrain and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2015 RAM 3500 has more active recalls (16 vs 1). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $11,350 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2015 Ford F-350 on NHTSA · 2015 RAM 3500 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Sponsored
Get a free warranty quote →