STRUT AND SHOCK ABSORBER REPLACEMENT GUIDELINES This bulletin has been amended. See AMENDMENT HISTORY on the last page. Please discard previous versions of this bulletin.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗2007 Nissan Murano suspension problems
moderate 90 complaints filed with NHTSA · avg repair $900 · see suspension across all vehicles →
Failure mileage
Complaints
90
Recalls
0
Avg fix
$900
1crash
When does it fail?
Of the 90 suspension complaints filed for the 2007 Nissan Murano, here's the actual mileage breakdown — failures cluster heaviest at 50,000-75,000 mi.
0-25k
25-50k
50-75k
75-100k
100-125k
125-150k
150k+
Each bar shows the share of total complaints filed at that mileage range. Peak failure window highlighted. Some owners report problems earlier; some make it well past 150,000 miles symptom-free. Maintenance habits and driving conditions shift the curve as much as mileage alone.
What stands out
Of the 9 model years of Nissan Murano we track for suspension problems, this one carries the most owner complaints on file — 90.
Owners have filed 90 suspension complaints with NHTSA against this vehicle, but no formal recall covers the issue — the federal record reflects what manufacturers have admitted, not everything owners are reporting.
Is there a fix? Manufacturer service bulletins
The manufacturer has issued service bulletins covering suspension on this vehicle — documented repair instructions, service campaigns, or warranty extensions sent to dealers. A TSB isn't a recall (it's not a free safety remedy), but it's the manufacturer acknowledging the issue and how to fix it.
STRUT AND SHOCK ABSORBER REPLACEMENT GUIDELINES This bulletin has been amended. See AMENDMENT HISTORY on the last page. Please discard previous versions of this bulletin.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗This SKU is a Suspension Ball Joint. The customer communication requested return of unsold inventory to inspect for the outer diameter of the ball joint housing being too small. The outer diameter being too small would prevent the part from being installed, and would therefore have no impact on the end user besides time to complete installation.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗NISSAN; VIBRATION AND/OR NOISE WHEN MAKING LOW SPEED TURNS This bulletin has been amended. See AMENDMENT HISTORY on the last page. Please discard previous versions of this bulletin.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗IF YOU CONFIRM There is a vibration or judder feeling from the rear of the vehicle; when making, turns, on dry roads, or at low speeds (under 40 MPH), and the vibration does not occur if the Electric Controlled Coupling is electrically disconnected. ACTION Replace the Electric Controlled Coupling for the rear final drive. See this bulletin for further detail.
full bulletin at NHTSA ↗Source: NHTSA manufacturer communications. Bring the bulletin number to your dealer or shop.
The failure pattern owners describe
The dominant failure in this cluster is aggressive rear subframe corrosion and structural breakdown in 2007 Nissan Murano models. Owners in salt-belt regions and some elsewhere report the rear K-frame (crossmember) rusting through completely, often by 80,000–170,000 miles, with some corrosion discovered as early as 39,000 miles. The rust penetrates mounting points and welds, causing the subframe to crack and occasionally separate from the vehicle body.
When the subframe fails, rear wheels camber sharply inward or outward, and the vehicle becomes unstable—swerving uncontrollably at highway speeds, especially in wet or snowy conditions. Owners report hearing loud clunks or snaps, dragging noises, and experiencing fishtailing that nearly caused accidents. Brand-new tires wear down to the wire on the inside edge within days due to the misalignment. Mechanics consistently declare these vehicles unsafe to drive; several refuse to work on them due to liability.
Owners describe well-maintained vehicles with full service records; many took the car to alignment shops, tire shops, and dealers multiple times without being warned of the underlying corrosion. When discovered, subframe replacement costs $2,000–$6,000. Nissan has issued no recall or repair campaign and declines assistance, citing out-of-warranty status. Secondary issues include sway bar detachment, lower control arm premature wear, wheel bearing failure (and questionable dealer diagnosis), and seat bracket failures. One owner's insurance company denied a collision claim because the underlying frame corrosion was deemed a material defect.
Same Nissan Murano suspension reports on nearby years: 2005 · 2006 · 2009 · 2010
Failure modes owners describe
Rear Subframe Rust-Through and Structural Failure
Rear subframe (K-frame/crossmember) corrodes severely and rusts through, compromising structural integrity. Occurs even on well-maintained vehicles in salt-belt regions and occasionally elsewhere. Corrosion is often extreme for the vehicle age (12–17 years old at time of complaint). Rust penetrates the mounting points, welds, and load-bearing areas, eventually causing cracking and separation from the vehicle body.
When: Typically 80,000–170,000 miles; corrosion can be present much earlier and discovered during routine maintenance or after a bump/impact.
Symptoms owners cite: Rear tires camber inward or outward at unnatural angles; Uncontrolled fishtailing or swerving at highway speeds or during acceleration, especially in wet/snowy conditions; Loud clunk, bang, or snap from the rear, sometimes heard while driving or when going over bumps; Vehicle instability and difficulty steering or stopping; Dragging/grinding noises from the undercarriage; Excessive inner tire wear or brand-new tires wearing down rapidly to the core; Rear end vibration and rumbling noise when braking; Sway bar detaching or resting on exhaust; Muffler/exhaust hanging low or dragging; Rear wheel alignment drifting or vehicle drifting and swaying during normal driving
Repairs/costs cited: Subframe replacement required, typically $2,000–$6,000 labor and parts; repairs range from $1,500–$5,279 depending on shop and whether parts are ordered. Some owners report partial or temporary welding attempts that mechanics advised were unsafe. One owner reported a wheel bearing misdiagnosis by a dealer that led to a transfer case failure ($3,400) after bearings were replaced.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Nissan states (per owner reports) no recalls or repair campaigns exist for this issue. When contacted, Nissan customer service has declined assistance citing out-of-warranty status. No TSBs or warranty programs mentioned by owners regarding subframe corrosion. One owner reported Nissan claiming it was 'their first complaint' despite multiple complaints on file.
Sway Bar Detachment and Corrosion
Rear stabilizer bar (sway bar) and its mounting brackets corrode and rust through. Corrosion can cause the bar to separate from the control arm connection points or dislodge entirely from the subframe, losing its function and becoming a potential hazard.
When: Occurs in conjunction with subframe rust; discovered during routine maintenance or inspection.
Symptoms owners cite: Clunking noises when turning or reversing at low speed; Sway bar detached on one or both sides from mounting points; Sway bar resting on the exhaust system; Vehicle handling poor in curves or wet conditions
Repairs/costs cited: Bar must be reattached or replaced as part of subframe repair. One owner stated a mechanic reattached the bar but subframe repair was still required.
Lower Control Arm and Tie Rod Premature Wear
Lower control arm ball joints and outer tie rods wear out prematurely (before 60,000 miles on some vehicles). Wear is detected during routine tire rotation or alignment service. Not directly caused by corrosion but listed as a separate suspension issue in the complaint cluster.
When: As early as 50,000–60,000 miles; one complaint at 101,000 miles.
Symptoms owners cite: No handling, steering, or rattling noises reported before failure; Wear detected only during tire rotation or wheel service
Repairs/costs cited: Left outer tie rod replaced on one vehicle; left and right lower control arms replaced on another. One complaint mentions dealer quoting ~$900 for control arm work, which was later determined to actually require subframe replacement.
Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Not covered under basic warranty per owner report.
Wheel Bearing Failure
Wheel bearings fail and produce noise in the wheel area. One owner's complaint involves dealer replacing a bearing on one side, then the replacement failing within a month, requiring replacement again. Another complaint lists a bad front driver-side wheel bearing causing a high-pitched whirring noise.
When: At 84,000 miles (first failure and replacement); high-pitched noise still present after bearing replacement on another vehicle.
Symptoms owners cite: Noises in the engine area (described as coming from wheel area); High-pitched whirring noise (front bearing); Clunking/grinding sounds from bottom of vehicle
Repairs/costs cited: First bearing replacement $600; second replacement (of the same bearing, reportedly defective) $400. One owner's bearing replacement did not resolve the high-pitched noise symptom.
Transfer Case Failure (Related to Wheel Bearing Repair Sequence)
One owner's complaint alleges that after wheel bearing replacement by a Nissan dealer, the vehicle experienced a catastrophic transfer case failure within days of being returned from service. The failure occurred shortly after acceleration and sounded like the bottom of the vehicle 'fell off.' Repair cost $3,400. Owner questions whether the bearing work contributed to the failure.
When: Approximately 1 month after wheel bearing replacement at a Nissan dealer; vehicle had 84,000 miles.
Symptoms owners cite: Loud bang from the engine area; Dragging and grinding sounds from the bottom of the vehicle; Vehicle came to a quick stop
Repairs/costs cited: Transfer case replacement $3,400. Vehicle was out of warranty.
Premature Frame Corrosion and Crossmember Rust-Through
Main frame and structural crossmember components corrode and rust excessively, unusual for the vehicle age. One owner's insurance company (Progressive) noted premature rust and voided collision coverage, citing 'substandard parts.' Another owner discovered major frame rust after a minor collision that would have been insurable except for the underlying corrosion.
When: At 125,000 miles; discovered after a minor impact or during routine inspection.
Symptoms owners cite: Crossmember completely rusted through; Main frame severely corroded; Rear seat bracket broken after minor impact; Extensive rust on vehicle undercarriage not visible during routine service visits
Repairs/costs cited: One owner had to pay for body shop repairs and frame welding; welder advised frame replacement was necessary. Insurance denied claim citing poor material quality.
Seat Bracket and Seat Support Failure
Driver-side seat anchor/bracket breaks or loosens, causing the seat to move or become unsupported. One complaint describes seat 'floating' on the left side; another describes the seat suddenly feeling as if it dropped backward while driving.
When: At various mileage; one complaint at 70,000 miles.
Symptoms owners cite: Seat suddenly feels as though it shifted or dropped; Driver-side seat bracket visibly broken; Seat 'floating' or unsupported on one side; Seat unstable during repositioning
Repairs/costs cited: One owner states 'bricks holding up' the seat as a temporary fix. Bracket replacement needed.
Synthesized from 90 NHTSA owner complaints — unverified consumer allegations, summarized for patterns. The verbatim filings appear below.
What owners are reporting 2 most recent
Rear sub frame rusted
Last year my drivers side front seat anchor/bracket broke. Poor design. Rear sub frame rusted out resulting in the rear left wheel to nearly fall off while driving. This year my wife was advised by a person in a vehicle behind her that the rear wheel was ready to launch. Road salt caused rusting to sub frame body mount. Again poor design and material. *tr
Had suspension trouble with your 2007 Nissan Murano?
File a complaint with NHTSA → It's free, official, and how every report above got here — owner filings are the federal safety record this page is built on.
Common questions
How serious is the suspension problem on the 2007 Nissan Murano?
It's a documented issue but not catastrophic. 90 complaints have been filed. Repairs average $900 and most owners catch it before it causes a breakdown.
At what mileage does the suspension typically fail?
Across the 50 complaints that reported odometer mileage, most suspension failures cluster between 107,000 and 160,000 miles, with the median around 140,000. A quarter of owners report trouble before 107,000; a quarter make it past 160,000. Maintenance history matters more than the odometer alone — this is the reported failure window, not a guarantee.
What does it cost to fix?
Independent shops typically charge around $900 for suspension repairs on this vehicle. Dealer pricing tends to run 20-40% higher. The exact figure depends on the specific failure mode, parts availability, and your local labor rates. If you're outside factory warranty, an extended service contract often covers this category.
Are there any recalls related to suspension?
No active recalls currently cover suspension issues on this vehicle. The complaints filed represent owner-reported failures that haven't risen to the level of a manufacturer-issued recall — but they're still worth knowing about before you buy or budget for repairs.
Related
Complaint and recall data sourced from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
public records database. Verify the raw federal record at
nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2007/Nissan/Murano.
Severity ratings are derived from reported crashes, fires, injuries, and fatalities. Repair cost estimates are
independent-shop national averages and may differ in your area. Some links on this page are affiliate links.