Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Different vehicle classes · Different segments — choice depends on use case

2015 Ford Escape vs 2015 Mazda CX-5

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2015 Ford Escape versus 2015 Mazda CX-5 — different vehicles, different jobs

These two come from different segments, which makes a direct reliability comparison less meaningful than usual. Showing the data so you can see what each one is good at and where each one breaks down. The reliability scores (3.0 versus 3.8) reflect different testing populations and use patterns — don't treat them as apples-to-apples.

2015 Ford Escape

3.0/5
Reliability score
1,011 complaints
3 recalls (0 critical)
$14,550 repair exposure
vs

2015 Mazda CX-5

3.8/5
Reliability score
133 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$12,000 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

These come from different vehicle segments, which means we're not declaring a winner here. The 2015 Ford Escape scores 3.0; the 2015 Mazda CX-5 scores 3.8. Different testing populations, different driving patterns, different categories of failure. Use the data below to understand what each one is good at and what each one breaks.

If you lean 2015 Ford Escape, know what you're getting into on powertrain and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2015 Mazda CX-5 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2015 Mazda CX-5? Watch the visibility and cruise control. The 2015 Ford Escape has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.2x higher on the 2015 Ford Escape. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: these are different categories of vehicle. Pick based on what you actually need it for. We're showing the reliability data so you can factor in long-term ownership cost, not pick a winner.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2015 Ford Escape
2015 Mazda CX-5
powertrain
271 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
19 reports
severe · ~$2,500
engine
186 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
electrical
107 reports
severe · ~$850
7 reports
moderate · ~$850
steering
78 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
body
30 reports
severe · ~$1,500
25 reports
severe · ~$1,500
wheels
23 reports
moderate · ~$400
No reports
brakes
15 reports
severe · ~$450
7 reports
severe · ~$450
airbags
14 reports
severe · ~$1,100
5 reports
severe · ~$1,100
visibility
No reports
16 reports
moderate · ~$350
cruise control
No reports
8 reports
severe · ~$600

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2015 Ford Escape or the 2015 Mazda CX-5?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2015 Mazda CX-5 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.0. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2015 Ford Escape?

Compared to the 2015 Mazda CX-5, the 2015 Ford Escape sees more reported issues in powertrain and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2015 Mazda CX-5?

Compared to the 2015 Ford Escape, the 2015 Mazda CX-5 has more complaints in visibility and cruise control. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2015 Ford Escape has more active recalls (3 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $14,550 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2015 Ford Escape on NHTSA · 2015 Mazda CX-5 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.