Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the compact suv segment

2015 Chevrolet Equinox vs 2015 Mazda CX-5

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2015 Mazda CX-5 clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2015 Mazda CX-5 edges the 2015 Chevrolet Equinox on reliability scoring (3.8 versus 3.3) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

2015 Chevrolet Equinox

3.3/5
Reliability score
678 complaints
1 recalls (0 critical)
$13,800 repair exposure
vs
More reliable

2015 Mazda CX-5

3.8/5
Reliability score
133 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$12,000 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2015 Mazda CX-5. Reliability score's a solid 3.8 versus 3.3 on the 2015 Chevrolet Equinox, and the complaint counts back it up — 133 versus 678. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2015 Chevrolet Equinox, know what you're getting into on visibility and engine. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2015 Mazda CX-5 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2015 Mazda CX-5? Watch the body and brakes. The 2015 Chevrolet Equinox has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2015 Chevrolet Equinox
2015 Mazda CX-5
visibility
264 reports
moderate · ~$350
16 reports
moderate · ~$350
engine
169 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
7 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
powertrain
60 reports
severe · ~$2,500
19 reports
severe · ~$2,500
electrical
37 reports
moderate · ~$850
7 reports
moderate · ~$850
airbags
35 reports
severe · ~$1,100
5 reports
severe · ~$1,100
body
7 reports
moderate · ~$1,500
25 reports
severe · ~$1,500
cruise control
9 reports
severe · ~$600
8 reports
severe · ~$600
steering
14 reports
severe · ~$700
No reports
brakes
No reports
7 reports
severe · ~$450

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2015 Chevrolet Equinox or the 2015 Mazda CX-5?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2015 Mazda CX-5 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.3. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2015 Chevrolet Equinox?

Compared to the 2015 Mazda CX-5, the 2015 Chevrolet Equinox sees more reported issues in visibility and engine. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2015 Mazda CX-5?

Compared to the 2015 Chevrolet Equinox, the 2015 Mazda CX-5 has more complaints in body and brakes. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2015 Chevrolet Equinox has more active recalls (1 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $13,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2015 Chevrolet Equinox on NHTSA · 2015 Mazda CX-5 on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.