Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

Direct rivals · Direct rivals in the compact suv segment

2016 Kia Sportage vs 2016 Nissan Rogue

Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.

Synced 2026-06-14 Source: NHTSA public records Reviewed by ASE-certified contributors
Quick verdict
2016 Kia Sportage clearly comes out ahead on reliability data

Two trucks built for the same buyer, and the data tells a clear story. The 2016 Kia Sportage edges the 2016 Nissan Rogue on reliability scoring (3.8 versus 3.1) with meaningful gaps in complaint volume and severity. Real differences, not noise.

More reliable

2016 Kia Sportage

3.8/5
Reliability score
129 complaints
0 recalls (0 critical)
$9,550 repair exposure
vs

2016 Nissan Rogue

3.1/5
Reliability score
535 complaints
4 recalls (0 critical)
$12,800 repair exposure

Stories from the shop

If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2016 Kia Sportage. Reliability score's a solid 3.8 versus 3.1 on the 2016 Nissan Rogue, and the complaint counts back it up — 129 versus 535. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.

If you lean 2016 Kia Sportage, know what you're getting into on engine and brakes. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2016 Nissan Rogue sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.

Going with the 2016 Nissan Rogue? Watch the powertrain and electrical. The 2016 Kia Sportage has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.

On the dollars-and-cents side, total repair exposure across the top problem areas runs 1.3x higher on the 2016 Nissan Rogue. That's the number to keep in mind when you're pricing the deal — a $2,000 difference in purchase price disappears the first time you're staring at a transmission rebuild.

Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.

— ProblemsByVin editorial team, drawing on the NHTSA data and shop experience.

Side-by-side by problem area

Category
2016 Kia Sportage
2016 Nissan Rogue
powertrain
6 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
169 reports
moderate · ~$2,500
electrical
16 reports
severe · ~$850
101 reports
moderate · ~$850
airbags
4 reports
severe · ~$1,100
54 reports
severe · ~$1,100
engine
40 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
16 reports
moderate · ~$3,100
brakes
33 reports
moderate · ~$450
No reports
steering
4 reports
severe · ~$700
23 reports
severe · ~$700
body
No reports
21 reports
severe · ~$1,500
suspension
No reports
17 reports
moderate · ~$900
seatbelts
No reports
15 reports
critical · ~$500
cruise control
4 reports
severe · ~$600
No reports

Common questions

Which is more reliable, the 2016 Kia Sportage or the 2016 Nissan Rogue?

Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2016 Kia Sportage comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.8 versus 3.1. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Kia Sportage?

Compared to the 2016 Nissan Rogue, the 2016 Kia Sportage sees more reported issues in engine and brakes. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.

What goes wrong more often on the 2016 Nissan Rogue?

Compared to the 2016 Kia Sportage, the 2016 Nissan Rogue has more complaints in powertrain and electrical. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.

Which has more recalls?

The 2016 Nissan Rogue has more active recalls (4 vs 0). Total count is less important than severity, though — a vehicle with one critical recall and zero moderate ones is generally riskier than one with five moderate recalls.

Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?

Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $12,800 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.

Related comparisons

Reliability scores, complaint counts, and severity ratings derived from the NHTSA public records database. Verify each vehicle's federal record: 2016 Kia Sportage on NHTSA · 2016 Nissan Rogue on NHTSA. "Repair exposure" is the sum of average independent-shop repair costs across each vehicle's tracked problem categories and is intended as a relative comparison, not an exact prediction. Editorial commentary written by ProblemsByVin contributors and reviewed by ASE-certified mechanics. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.