2017 Hyundai Tucson vs 2017 Mazda CX-5
Reliability comparison based on NHTSA recall and complaint records.
2017 Hyundai Tucson
2017 Mazda CX-5
Stories from the shop
If I'm picking between these two head-to-head, I'm taking the 2017 Mazda CX-5. Reliability score's a solid 3.7 versus 3.2 on the 2017 Hyundai Tucson, and the complaint counts back it up — 146 versus 1,068. That's not noise, that's a real gap between rivals built for the same buyer.
If you lean 2017 Hyundai Tucson, know what you're getting into on engine and powertrain. Those categories have noticeably more complaints than the 2017 Mazda CX-5 sees, and they're not cheap items when they go.
Going with the 2017 Mazda CX-5? Watch the visibility. The 2017 Hyundai Tucson has fewer reports in those categories, so you'd be trading one set of weak spots for another.
Bottom line: pick based on use case more than the spec sheet. If you tow heavy and don't want to think about it, that's one calculation. If you're a daily driver and want the cheapest path forward, that's another. Both of these will get you down the road. We're just telling you where each one is most likely to break.
Side-by-side by problem area
Common questions
Which is more reliable, the 2017 Hyundai Tucson or the 2017 Mazda CX-5?
Based on the NHTSA data we track, the 2017 Mazda CX-5 comes out ahead with a reliability score of 3.7 versus 3.2. The margin is clear, so the verdict could shift if you weight specific categories differently or factor in your own use case.
What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Hyundai Tucson?
Compared to the 2017 Mazda CX-5, the 2017 Hyundai Tucson sees more reported issues in engine and powertrain. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck — it means those are the categories worth budgeting for if you go that direction.
What goes wrong more often on the 2017 Mazda CX-5?
Compared to the 2017 Hyundai Tucson, the 2017 Mazda CX-5 has more complaints in visibility. Whether that's a deal-breaker depends on the cost and severity — see the comparison table above for repair cost ranges.
Which has more recalls?
Both vehicles have 1 active recalls. Total recall count alone isn't a great signal — what matters is severity. See the recall counts by severity in the comparison table.
Is an extended warranty worth it on either of these?
Both vehicles are out of factory bumper-to-bumper coverage at this point. Combined repair exposure across the top problem categories runs around $11,550 on the higher-risk vehicle. A quality service contract typically costs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years, so a single major failure usually pays for the contract. The math favors warranty coverage on whichever vehicle you choose, especially if you plan to keep it past 100,000 miles.