Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.

Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.

2022 Nissan Rogue powertrain problems

severe 29 complaints filed with NHTSA · avg repair $2,500 · see powertrain across all vehicles →

Complaints
29
Recalls
0
Avg fix
$2,500
2crashes
What stands out

Owners have filed 29 powertrain complaints with NHTSA against this vehicle, but no formal recall covers the issue — the federal record reflects what manufacturers have admitted, not everything owners are reporting.

The failure pattern owners describe

Buyer takeaway: A 2022 Rogue with the 1.5L VC-Turbo engine is prone to sudden engine bearing failure causing limp mode or complete shutdown on highways, EGR contamination triggering power loss, and turbo/coolant leaks requiring full engine replacement. Buyers should verify any recall remedies were performed in full (including mandatory oil pan inspection), not just software updates, and avoid these vehicles if they cannot confirm in writing that recalls are genuinely resolved.

Owners of 2022 Nissan Rogues describe catastrophic powertrain failures, many linked to active recalls for engine bearing defects. The most common scenario is sudden loss of power on highways—vehicles drop to 35–40 mph on flat roads or 10 mph uphill, with the engine knocking loudly and malfunction lights illuminated. In severe cases, the engine shuts down entirely, leaving owners stranded. Some owners report the engine failing before any warning appears; one owner drove the vehicle for months with no symptoms, then experienced complete shutdown at only 5,000 miles after purchase.

Engine bearing contamination ties directly to coolant and oil system failures. Owners describe turbocharger leaks, coolant entering the oil, and full engine block replacement costing $11,500–$14,000. One owner had a turbo installed under recall but it failed within days.

The EGR system repeatedly fails with contamination codes (U0652), even after replacement. Dealers quote $700–$1,200 for turbo and sensor repairs, sometimes claiming these are unrelated to recalls despite obvious symptom overlap.

Critically, many dealers appear to have performed only ECM software updates to "fix" recalls without the required physical oil pan inspection for metal debris. Owners report vehicles marked as recall-complete in the system while safety defects persist. One owner spent 30 days at a dealership, received contradictory diagnoses (engine replacement, then just spark plugs), and the underlying problem was never addressed.

Transmission CVT failures and unintended acceleration incidents round out the powertrain issues, with limited recourse once out of warranty.

Same Nissan Rogue powertrain reports on nearby years: 2019 · 2021 · 2023 · 2024

Failure modes owners describe

Engine bearing failure leading to sudden loss of power / limp mode

Internal engine bearing degradation causes progressive loss of power, engine noise, and limp-mode activation. Owners report sudden inability to exceed 35-40 mph on flat terrain, barely 10 mph uphill, with high RPM noise and illuminated malfunction lights. In severe cases, the engine shuts down completely on highway, creating immediate safety risk.

When: Typically occurs between 21,000-55,000 miles; one owner at 39,000 miles experienced complete failure

Symptoms owners cite: Sudden loss of motive power at highway speeds; Limp mode limiting speed to 35-40 mph on flat roads, ~10 mph uphill; High RPM and loud engine noise during limp mode; Engine malfunction warning light and 'service now' message; Severe bucking and hesitation; Engine shaking while idling; Gurgling noises from engine

Codes mentioned: Malfunction indicator light (MIL) illumination, Engine malfunction / power reduced messages

Repairs/costs cited: Recall 25V-437 / R25A8 calls for ECM software update, oil pan inspection for metal debris, oil change, and gasket replacement. Many owners report dealers performing only the software update without the mandatory physical oil pan drop inspection. In cases where internal damage or bearing degradation is confirmed, full engine replacement has been required, costing $11,500-$14,000. One owner's engine was replaced but the replacement engine exhibited turbo failure shortly after.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Recalls 25V-437 and R25A8 issued for engine bearing failure. ECM software update without physical inspection has proven inadequate as a remedy; many owners remain unsafe despite recall completion status being marked in the system. Nissan initially offered 50% cost coverage in at least one case and later refused to provide written decision documentation.

EGR valve and sensor contamination / failure

Exhaust Gas Recirculation system fails due to internal contamination, blockages in sensors, and degradation of the EGR valve and differential-pressure sensor. Owners report intermittent power loss, drivability issues, and limp mode triggered by sensor fault codes.

When: First reported between April 2025 and earlier dates; recurring in some owners who had EGR replaced previously

Symptoms owners cite: Intermittent engine power loss; Engine malfunction and service now warnings; Loss of communication with EGR system (DTC U0652); Sluggish or delayed acceleration; Engine shaking; Low coolant levels with no external leaks (internal coolant loss)

Codes mentioned: U0652 (Lost Communication with EGR System), Code U0652 (EGR sensor and pin fitment at EMC)

Repairs/costs cited: EGR valve replacement, EGR cooler replacement, differential-pressure sensor replacement, and system bleeding have been performed by dealers. Repair costs quoted at $700-$1,200 for turbo sensor diagnostics and repair. One owner had EGR replaced once under recall, then replaced again due to failure. Contamination noted in some cases but dealers claim issues unrelated to recalls despite symptom alignment.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Nissan initially classified EGR contamination as unrelated to Recall R25A8 despite the bearing debris and coolant contamination being capable of circulating through EGR circuits. Nissan offered only 50% cost coverage in one documented case and refused to provide written decision. Dealers have not consistently followed recall inspection protocol (oil pan drop requirement).

Turbocharger failure and coolant contamination

Turbocharger develops leaks, allowing coolant to enter the engine or vice versa. Owners report sudden turbo sensor faults, turbo failure after recent replacement, and discovery of coolant in the oil requiring full engine block replacement.

When: Detected between 30,500-55,000 miles; one owner discovered turbo leak during routine oil change less than 5 years and 30,500 miles into ownership

Symptoms owners cite: Turbo sensor fault codes and check engine light; Coolant leaking into engine or oil; Turbocharger component failure or degradation; Engine knocking and vibration during acceleration; Shuddering at idle; Smoking from exhaust or engine; Loss of power

Codes mentioned: Turbo sensor related codes, Check engine light / malfunction indicator light

Repairs/costs cited: Turbo sensor replacement quoted at $700. Turbocharger assembly replacement quoted at $7,200. Full engine block replacement required in cases where coolant contamination was severe, with quotes ranging from $11,500 to $14,000. One owner had a turbocharger installed under recall remedy, but the new turbo failed within days of pickup.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No recalls specifically address turbocharger failure. Turbo failures have occurred shortly after engine replacement and turbo installation under recall remedy, suggesting the underlying defect persists or new components are defective. No warranty coverage offered in some cases.

Transmission CVT failure and power reduction

Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) exhibits warning lights, power reduction, and eventual failure requiring replacement. Owners report CVT power reduced warnings and check engine lights appearing intermittently before transmission replacement becomes necessary.

When: First symptoms at 44,000-48,000 miles; replacement performed at 55,000 miles in one case; recurrence at 59,975 miles

Symptoms owners cite: CVT power reduced warning light illumination; Check engine light; Yellow box warning displayed; Sluggish or delayed acceleration; Transmission appears to be operating with reduced performance; Warning lights return after transmission replacement

Codes mentioned: CVT warning light codes, Check engine light

Repairs/costs cited: Full CVT transmission replacement performed at 55,000 miles. Cost not specified by owner but transmission replacement typically ranges $3,000-$5,000+. One owner reports CVT warning light returned at 59,975 miles (after 4,975 miles of use post-replacement) along with new engine light, indicating potential recurring defect.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: One dealer determined vehicle was 'operating as designed' despite CVT power reduced light and check engine light. Another dealer diagnosed transmission failure but found no warranty coverage. Manufacturer opened case and confirmed no warranty or recall coverage for the initial failure.

Unintended acceleration and throttle body malfunction

Vehicle accelerates without driver input or continues accelerating after releasing the accelerator pedal. Throttle body and electronic throttle control fail to respond correctly, creating immediate highway safety hazard.

When: Occurs at highway speeds during normal operation; one incident at approximately 10,000 miles

Symptoms owners cite: Vehicle continues to accelerate after releasing accelerator pedal; Engine revs when brakes are released; Vehicle accelerates to 85 mph uncontrollably; No warning lights before failure (lights appear only after restart in one case)

Repairs/costs cited: Throttle body replacement performed in at least one case. One owner reports engine replacement and throttle body replacement without resolution of acceleration issues (car still stumbles from stop). Vehicle remained at dealer for diagnosis without repair in another case.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Recall R25E3 issued for throttle body failure. One owner reports dealer performed only ECM software update to clear recall status without physical throttle body inspection or replacement, leaving vehicle unsafe.

Loss of traction control and ABS failure in adverse conditions

Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) and Vehicle Dynamic Control (traction control) fail to engage during emergency braking in snow, resulting in complete loss of vehicle control. Vehicle skids and spins without intervention from safety systems despite being equipped with modern 4-channel ABS and advanced VDC.

When: Incident occurred during snowstorm at low speed (~5 mph); sporadic malfunction lights reported prior but not before the incident

Symptoms owners cite: Vehicle loss of control and skidding ~145 degrees without safety system intervention; Brakes lock up without ABS intervention; No ABS engagement despite modern 4-channel system; No traction control intervention despite VDC system equipped; No warning lights before failure; Vehicle spun multiple times in snow conditions (reported by separate owner with 2021 Rogue); Sporadic emergency brake malfunction light

Repairs/costs cited: No repair documented; owner requesting free safety systems inspection. One owner with similar 2021 Rogue experienced same spins and refuses to drive in snow.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No manufacturer response documented. Owner requests Nissan conduct free inspection of ABS and VDC systems.

Vehicle rolling in park with no warning

Vehicle slowly moves backward while in park and on an incline, accelerating backward without driver input until hitting an obstacle (curb and tree). No warning lights illuminate before or during the failure.

When: Incident mileage unknown; vehicle relatively new

Symptoms owners cite: Vehicle slowly moves backward while in park (P); Vehicle accelerates backward on incline; No warning lights illuminated during failure; Airbags do not deploy

Repairs/costs cited: Vehicle linked to NHTSA Campaign 22V457000 (Powertrain) but not yet diagnosed or repaired.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No notification made to manufacturer; no recall remedy identified by owner.

Engine stalling, startup failure, and inability to restart

Engine stalls without warning during normal driving, and vehicle refuses to restart. Multiple jump starts do not resolve issue. Diagnosis reveals catastrophic engine failure requiring complete replacement.

When: First stalling incident reported in November 2024 at startup; final failure in May 2025 at approximately 5,000 miles since purchase

Symptoms owners cite: Difficulty starting (jump start required in November 2024); Vehicle shakes during normal driving; Engine stalls suddenly while driving; Engine fails to restart after stalling; Multiple jump starts ineffective; No warning signals or messages before shutdown; Complete engine failure on diagnostic

Repairs/costs cited: Authorized Nissan dealer diagnosed complete engine failure requiring replacement; quoted cost $14,000. Dealer refused to perform repair. Vehicle remains non-functional and unrepaired.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: No Nissan response documented. Owner reports dealership refused to fix vehicle and suggested no available remedy.

Recall remedy failure and incomplete recall processing

Manufacturer and dealers perform only partial recall remedies (ECM software update without physical inspection) and mark recalls as complete in system even when underlying mechanical defects remain. Owners cannot confirm recall completion status and remain unsafe.

When: Ongoing throughout 2024-2025 recall campaigns

Symptoms owners cite: Vehicles marked as recall-complete in NHTSA/Nissan system but defects persist; Dealer performs software update only, skips mandatory oil pan inspection; Continued bucking, hesitation, and noise despite marked 'remedy'; NHTSA website shows 'Recall Incomplete' despite dealer claim of completion; No written confirmation provided by dealers

Repairs/costs cited: Recall 25V-437 / R25A8 protocol requires ECM reprogramming, oil pan drop and inspection for debris, oil change, and gasket replacement. Dealers performing only the software portion without physical inspection, allowing owners to unknowingly remain in unsafe vehicles.

Recalls/TSBs owners mention: Recalls 25V-437, R25A8, R25E2, and R25E3 issued but remedy protocols not consistently followed by authorized dealers. Nissan has provided only verbal phone communication in some cases, refusing written documentation. Timeline for remedy updates stated as 'three days' but not delivered.

Synthesized from 29 NHTSA owner complaints — unverified consumer allegations, summarized for patterns. The verbatim filings appear below.

What owners are reporting 3 most recent

powertrain · filed 12/19/2025

I bring my car for a recall notice on the 11/28/25 , and on Saturday 11/29/25 my car lost power he couldn't go faster than 45 mph. and the engine light on and 3 other lights was on to, I bring my car back to the dealer and they told me it was the oil cooler thermostat and bled system they charged me 1203.20 for the fix. and they keep my car for 3 days. finally , they returned the car to me on…

powertrain · filed 12/17/2024

The attached letter of 10/14/24 to the manufacturer and to the dealership describes the reproduced safety problem that put us at risk 4 times. Engine failure. Yes the 4 times were confirmed by the Pat Fischer Nissan Dealership. The vehicle was diagnosed and inspected by the manufacturers authorized representative, Nissan dealership of Titusville, Fl. 32780. The warning lamps, messages appeared at…

powertrain · filed 12/15/2025

The vehicle, a 2022 Nissan Rogue with the 1.5L VC-Turbo engine, suddenly entered severe limp mode: unable to exceed 35-40 mph on flat roads, barely 10 mph on hills, with high RPM and noise. The malfunction indicator light illuminated along with "engine malfunction service now" message and triangle warning light. These symptoms exactly match the early warning signs in safety recall 25V-437 for…

Had powertrain trouble with your 2022 Nissan Rogue? File a complaint with NHTSA → It's free, official, and how every report above got here — owner filings are the federal safety record this page is built on.

Common questions

How serious is the powertrain problem on the 2022 Nissan Rogue?

It's a meaningful issue. 29 complaints have been filed and the failure mode causes operational problems for owners. Repairs average $2,500.

At what mileage does the powertrain typically fail?

Based on the 29 complaints filed, powertrain issues most often appear around 10,000 miles. Some report problems earlier; some make it well past 150,000 with no symptoms. Maintenance habits matter — vehicles that received timely fluid services and were not regularly overworked tend to last longer.

What does it cost to fix?

Independent shops typically charge around $2,500 for powertrain repairs on this vehicle. Dealer pricing tends to run 20-40% higher. The exact figure depends on the specific failure mode, parts availability, and your local labor rates. If you're outside factory warranty, an extended service contract often covers this category.

Are there any recalls related to powertrain?

No active recalls currently cover powertrain issues on this vehicle. The complaints filed represent owner-reported failures that haven't risen to the level of a manufacturer-issued recall — but they're still worth knowing about before you buy or budget for repairs.

Related

Complaint and recall data sourced from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) public records database. Verify the raw federal record at nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2022/Nissan/Rogue. Severity ratings are derived from reported crashes, fires, injuries, and fatalities. Repair cost estimates are independent-shop national averages and may differ in your area. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Get a free warranty quote →
Sponsored — we earn a commission if you complete a quote. Disclosure.