Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2013 Escape vehicles manufactured from October 5, 2011, through July 11, 2012, and equipped with a 1
A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.
Free. Instant. No signup. Pulls recalls and complaints for your exact vehicle.
Couldn't find that VIN. Check the digits and try again.
The 2013 Ford Escape has 2,743 NHTSA owner complaints on file — not a small number. 5 active recall campaigns.
The 2013 Ford Escape has 2,743 NHTSA owner complaints and 5 recalls on file (U.S. federal records, as of July 2026). The most-reported system is engine at 1,034 complaints, typically surfacing around 81,881 miles (~$3,100 to repair). Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation.
| Model year | Owner complaints | Recalls |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 Escape | 2,126 | 1 |
| 2011 Escape | 1,312 | 1 |
| 2012 Escape | 598 | 2 |
| 2013 Escape (this page) | 2,743 | 5 |
| 2014 Escape | 2,067 | 3 |
| 2015 Escape | 1,028 | 3 |
| 2016 Escape | 1,031 | 1 |
Below average for the segment. Multiple systems have recurring complaints.
The data says walk unless this exact vehicle has documented proof the powertrain was repaired or replaced.
Our read of the federal NHTSA complaint and recall record for this exact year and model — not a substitute for a pre-purchase inspection. How we score.
Here's what this model is known to do — so you can inspect for it, price it in, or make the seller fix it before you sign.
⚠ The one to take seriously: powertrain is flagged severe on this model , showing up around 85,691 mi. Inspect it closely on a test drive.
Run the VIN from the listing — 5 active recalls on this model. Recall repairs are always free.
Verdict for buyers: 5.2/10 model. The priciest documented failure is engine (~$3,100) — get the seller's service records for it or inspect closely. Otherwise an average-risk used buy at a fair price.
We tell you what this model is known for and what to inspect — a vehicle-history report tells you what this exact car has been through. Smart buyers get both.
See the full pre-purchase inspection checklist →Twenty model years of Ford Escape and Edge ranked by NHTSA owner complaint count. The data covers two engine eras (Duratec V6 / Mazda I4 platform through 2012, EcoBoost-dominant from 2013 onward) and reveals which years took the worst beating from owners.
| # | Year | Model | Complaints | Recalls | Slug |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | Escape | 2,737 | 5 | New 1.6L EcoBoost coolant intrusion fires, transmission |
| 2 | 2017 | Escape | 2,541 | 1 | 1.6L EcoBoost remains, 6F35 transmission, multiple TSBs |
| 3 | 2013 | Edge | 2,419 | 1 | MyFord Touch infotainment failures, electrical |
| 4 | 2008 | Escape | 2,413 | 2 | Cruise control deactivation switch (Texas Instruments fire recall) |
| 5 | 2010 | Escape | 2,122 | 1 | 3.0L Duratec V6, transmission TSBs |
| 6 | 2014 | Escape | 2,048 | 3 | 1.6L EcoBoost block cracking, 2.0L EcoBoost timing belt |
| 7 | 2011 | Edge | 1,797 | 3 | MyFord Touch launch year, electrical complaints dominant |
| 8 | 2009 | Escape | 1,688 | 0 | Cruise switch fire concern, transmission |
| 9 | 2018 | Escape | 1,631 | 2 | 1.5L EcoBoost coolant intrusion, head replacement campaign |
| 10 | 2005 | Escape | 1,584 | 2 | 3.0L Duratec, first-gen Mazda-derived chassis |
| 11 | 2020 | Escape | 1,418 | 4 | 4th-gen launch year, brake system, fuel pump campaigns |
| 12 | 2011 | Escape | 1,311 | 1 | Last year of first-gen platform, electrical, 6F35 TSBs |
| 13 | 2017 | Edge | 1,252 | 2 | 2.0L EcoBoost coolant intrusion, transmission |
| 14 | 2012 | Edge | 1,126 | 1 | Sync infotainment, 3.5L V6 TSBs |
| 15 | 2008 | Edge | 1,115 | 2 | First-gen Edge, transmission, suspension |
The 2013 Ford Escape you are researching now sits at the top of this list with 2,737 owner complaints filed, more than any other Ford compact SUV in our database. The dominant failure modes are the 1.6L EcoBoost engine and the 6F35 automatic transmission.
The 1.6L EcoBoost (engine code GTDI 1.6L, internal Ford code Sigma) was a small-displacement turbocharged four-cylinder that Ford pushed across the 2013-2016 Escape lineup. The block design routed engine coolant through a cylinder head passage that was prone to cracking. Cracked passages dumped coolant into the cylinders, and at the worst end of the failure mode, the engines caught fire. Ford issued multiple recall campaigns covering the 1.6L from 2013 forward and replaced thousands of engines under warranty.
The 6F35 transmission was Ford’s six-speed automatic shared with the Fusion. Hard shifts, delayed engagement, and torque converter shudder are documented in hundreds of complaints. Ford issued reflash TSBs but never produced a redesigned valve body for the 6F35.
Two takeaways for someone shopping a used Ford compact SUV. First, check the engine block for the coolant-intrusion service campaign completion on any 1.6L EcoBoost from 2013 to 2016. The dealer service record will show the campaign code. Second, the 2014-2016 Escape with the 2.0L EcoBoost has its own timing belt issue (the wet belt in oil design) that fails between 80,000 and 120,000 miles. Belt-in-oil engines are not user-serviceable and require dealer intervention.
If you are shopping any year on this list, get the recall completion records before money changes hands. Ford will fix open recalls at no cost regardless of vehicle ownership history.
Recall and complaint counts pulled from the NHTSA recallsByVehicle and complaintsByVehicle APIs. Filter: Ford Escape, Edge, and Bronco Sport, all model years tracked. Sort: owner complaint count descending. Bronco Sport years 2021-2024 produced lower complaint volumes and are not in this top 15 because the model has been in production fewer years.
VIN-specific recall status at nhtsa.gov/recalls.
When owners report each system failing, in actual miles — so you can see what's likely behind you, what's due around now, and what to budget for next. Enter your mileage to mark where you are.
"Typical" = median owner-reported failure mileage from the NHTSA complaint record for this exact year and model. Not a maintenance schedule — a heads-up on where this model's failures cluster.
The transmission has completely gone out. On this car model, there isn't a dip stick for the owner to check transmission fluid levels. While pulling out of a parking space the car hesitated on going into first gear and then jerked really hard before continuing to move. While…
On 12-22-2021during routine vehicle servicing of my 2013 Ford Escape at Mac Haik Ford in Georgetown, TX, Invoice Number 776999, I was told by the Service Advisor that the mechanic was having troubles getting the wheels off to rotate and balance. Sophie Rosa, Service Advisor…
Tl* the contact owns a 2013 Ford escape. The contact stated that engine coolant leaked from the vehicle with the engine coolant warning message on the instrument panel. The contact stated that he frequently refilled the coolant due to the failure. Neither the dealer nor the…
I own a 2013 Ford escape. I can be driving along and all of a sudden it stalls with no warning. We have taken it to the shop and after lots of money out of pocket , I still do not have a resolution. They can't find anything wrong. Ford needs to recall these vehicles and fix the…
Drag to your current mileage. Numbers are derived from this vehicle's complaint history.
A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may result in a fire.
Leaking engine oil may come into contact with a hot engine surface potentially resulting in an engine compartment fire.
As leaking engine coolant evaporates on the hot engine, the glycol may ignite causing an engine compartment fire.
It's got known weak points. With a reliability score of 5.2 out of 10 based on 2,743 owner complaints filed with NHTSA, the 2013 Ford Escape has a higher-than-average rate of reported issues. The areas to watch are listed above. Whether it's worth owning depends on price, condition, and how much repair exposure you can absorb.
On the NHTSA data, the 2013 Ford Escape is one to avoid unless a specific vehicle proves otherwise. The data says walk unless this exact vehicle has documented proof the powertrain was repaired or replaced. The record behind that call: 45 fire-related complaints and 2 crash-related complaints on the engine; Powertrain: 381 complaints, classified severe, failures cluster 51,000–120,000 mi; Electrical system: 282 complaints, classified severe, failures cluster 37,498–88,000 mi; Reliability score 5.2/10 — around the segment average. This is our read of the federal complaint and recall data — not a substitute for a pre-purchase inspection.
Inspect the engine first — it's the most-reported issue on this model, with 1,034 owner complaints filed. Typical failure occurs around 81,881 miles. Average repair cost runs about $3,100 at an independent shop. Also confirm any open recalls have been completed by running the VIN, and ask for service records covering the problem areas listed above.
It scores 5.2 out of 10 on our NHTSA-based read of 2,743 owner complaints. The main thing to watch is engine. Typical failure occurs around 81,881 miles. Priced fairly and clean on inspection, it's a reasonable used buy. Our data covers what this model is known for — pair it with a vehicle-history report on the VIN to see what that specific car has been through.
Based on NHTSA records, the most-reported issue is engine, with 1,034 complaints filed. Typical failure occurs around 81,881 miles. Average repair cost runs about $3,100 at an independent shop.
The engine is one of the costlier repair items. Average repair cost runs about $3,100 at an independent shop. Typical failure occurs around 81,881 miles. Catching early warning signs can sometimes extend life by 20–30,000 miles.
Paste your VIN into the decoder at the top of this page. We pull live from NHTSA, so you'll see exactly which campaigns apply to your vehicle and whether the dealer has logged the fix. Recall repairs are always free regardless of mileage or warranty status.
Math is straightforward: a quality service contract runs $1,800–3,500 over 3 years. With 2,743 complaints on file and the costliest repair averaging $3,100, one major failure more than pays for it. The catch is reading the contract — many providers exclude wear items and require pre-authorization, so cheaper plans are not always better value.